Markham Advertising Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1968-03-26

Cited by 141 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*432 Hill, J. (dissenting) — I dissent. I see in the majority opinion only a very well written defense and justification of legislation which would never have been enacted if it had not been necessary to avoid a penalty in the terms of a reduction of federal aid for our highway program. The majority explains the situation clearly: The principal dif…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.