Mark Duckworth v. Pratt & Whitney, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · Decided 1998-08-24

Cited by 183 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. The facts alleged in this case are simple: that Pratt Whitney refused to rehire Mark Duckworth because he had.a “poor” attendance rating resulting from his fifty-two day absence from work in 1994 caused by a serious health condition, an absence protected by the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.