Marcus Bros. Textiles, Inc. v. Price Waterhouse, LLP

Decided 1999-04-09

Cited by 110 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Chief Justice Mitchell dissenting. I do not believe that plaintiff Marcus Brothers Textiles, Inc. (Marcus Brothers) forecast substantial evidence tending to show that defendant Price Waterhouse, LLP (Price Waterhouse) knew that the audited 1992 financial statement of Piece Goods Shops Company, L.P. (Piece Goods) would be provided to Marcus Brothers or a limited group of creditors of which Marcu…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.