Marcos Poventud v. City of New York

U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · Decided 2014-01-16

Cited by 161 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judge. I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. I believe the district court correctly held that plaintiff-appellant Marcos Poventud’s claims were based on factual allegations that are inconsistent with his 2006 conviction for attempted robbery. I agree, however, that the judgment should be vacated and the ease remanded for further proceedings to the extent that Poventud’s claims do not imply…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.