Manchester Environmental Coalition v. Stockton

Decided 1981-05-05

Cited by 128 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*73 Speziale, J. (dissenting). The majority of the court, by its action today, has usurped the fact-finding function of the trial court. Whether the defendants’ conduct is “reasonably likely unreasonably to pollute” the environment is a question of fact. General Statutes § 22a-17; Mystic Marinelife Aquarium,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.