Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., and Jerry A. Alexander

U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit · Decided 1992-09-24

Cited by 114 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This action for patent infringement and inducement to infringe relates to the use of a patented medical device in violation of a “single use only” notice that accompanied the sale of the device. Mallinckrodt sold its patented device to hospitals, which after initial use of the devices sent them to Medi-part for servicing that enabled the hospitals to…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.