Maisenbacker v. Society Concordia

Decided 1899-01-04

Cited by 104 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Halx, J. The complaint alleges in substance that the plaintiff, having contracted with and paid the defendant for the privilege of dancing at a certain ball, was, by the forcible *376 acts of the defendant’s agents, prevented from exercising her said right, and was thereby caused pain and damage. The trial court correctly charged the jury that the complai…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.