Ludlow v. DeBerry

Decided 1998-01-29

Cited by 123 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*281 OPINION ON REHEARING ANDERSON, Justice. Appellant, Howard Ludlow, raises two points in Ms motion for rehearing challenging our analysis and disposition of points of error one and two concerning the ruling on Lud-low’s motion to recuse the trial judge. Ap-pellees, Scott DeBerry, Scott DeBerry Interests, Inc., and Falcon Products, Inc., have also f…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.