Lowe v. City of Monrovia

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1985-10-30

Cited by 339 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SCHWARZER, District Judge, dissenting in part. The majority opinion holds that Lowe has made out a prima facie case of disparate treatment simply by showing that she was not hired by the City to fill a vacancy. It treats the City’s rules and practices under which an applicant must qualify to be hired as mere evidence admissible at trial to rebut an inference of discrimination. In so doing,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.