BARRETT, Circuit Judge, concurring: I fully concur in Judge Baldock’s en banc opinion. I write separately to emphasize one point. The fact that proffered mitigating testimony is relevant does not, standing alone, *603 render its exclusion reversible error. Skipper v. South Carolina, — U.S. —, <span class="citation" data-"9430…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.