Longworth v. Van Houten

Decided 1988-03-01

Cited by 156 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

223 N.J. Super. 174 (1988) 538 A.2d 414 ZENTA LONGWORTH, PLAINTIFF, v. PETER VAN HOUTEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. and ZENTA LONGWORTH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE OHIO CASUALTY GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CECELIA V. NASH AND JAMES S. NASH, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY A…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.