Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1965-05-27

Cited by 557 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Chief Judge Desmond (concurring). In Singer v. Walker, I concur for affirmance but I emphatically disagree with the majority’s holding that these papers do not charge the commission by defendant of a tortious act within this State. To my eye the record plainly establishes not one but both bases of jurisdiction described in CPLR 302, that is, that defendant transacted business within this State within the mean…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.