Lesikar v. Rappeport

Decided 2000-12-06

Cited by 245 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING CORNELIUS, Chief Justice. S. Gary Werley and the law firm of Bishop, Payne, Williams Werley, L.L.P. (collectively, Werley) have filed a motion for rehearing in which they contend that we should clarify our judgment to reflect that no costs on appeal are assessed against Werley. The judgment in the case reads, “It is further ORDERED that the parties each pay one half of the costs…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.