Legros v. Tarr

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1989-06-28

Cited by 113 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Holmes, J. The controlling issue presented by this case is whether appellants are entitled to recover a commission, or finder’s fee, in quantum meruit, from appellees, based upon the theory of quasi-contract, or contract implied in law. As to one of the appellants, Butcher Singer, we answer such query in the affirmative and thus, in this respect, reverse the court of appeals. However, we affirm the court of appeals’…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.