Lee v. Comer

Decided 1976-05-18

Cited by 115 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Caplan, Justice: This appeal involves one aspect of the parental immunity doctrine. Specifically, the question is: Can the plaintiff, an unemancipated daughter of the defendant, maintain an action in tort against said defendant for injuries allegedly received by her in an accident which occurred while she was a passenger in an automobile owned by the defendant? The trial court’s answer in the negative prompted this appeal.</p…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.