Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. Estes

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1998-08-27

Cited by 2,466 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge THOMAS; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD. TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: We address the continued viability and application of the “pro se prisoner fair notice” requirement of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 56”) adopted in Klingele v. Eikenberry, </em…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.