Layman v. Binns

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1988-02-24

Cited by 217 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Locher, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. Although I have no quarrel with the law expressed in the syllabus, I cannot concur in its application by the majority to the facts of this case. In my view, the trial court properly found that the structural defect in the basement wall was not readily apparent upon reasonable inspection by persons inexperienced in such matters, like the Laymans. The obs…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.