Lanford v. Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 1993-02-17

Cited by 107 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge, dissenting. Believing the Court of Appeals correctly decided the issue here presented, I respectfully dissent. The majority notes that “there is absolutely nothing in the legislative history of the 1991 amendments suggesting anyone intended for subsection (d) to apply to civil and criminal cases.” (Op. at 587, emphasis in original.) Likewise, there is nothing in that histo…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.