DIXON, Justice (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion finds Laird negligent (guilty of “criminal negligence”) and his negligence to be a “cause-in-fact” of the accident, but excuses him from civil liability because he owed no duty to Hare, the following motorist. Why ? Is it because Hare was more negligent than Laird? The majority only says that “under the circumstances” La…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.