Lahti v. Fosterling

Supreme Court of Michigan · Decided 1959-11-24

Cited by 133 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Carr, J. (dissenting). Plaintiff instituted this proceeding under the provisions of the workmen’s-compensation law of the State. * The question at issue is whether an employee suffering a compensable injury arising out of and in the course of his employment is subject, as to medical and hospital expenses, to the provision of the statute in effect at the time of such disability. The facts are not in disp…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.