Lackey v. State

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 1991-05-29

Cited by 108 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

TEAGUE, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent to this Court’s majority opinion’s overruling the sixth point of error that is presented on behalf of Clarence Allen Lackey, henceforth appellant, that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s affirmative finding “[that] there is a probability that the defendant would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat of society.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.