L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los Angeles

Supreme Court of California · Decided 2000-03-02

Cited by 106 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MOSK, J. —I dissent. The provisions at issue, antisolicitation regulations under City of Los Angeles Ordinance No. 171664 (the ordinance), target a broad range of conduct and speech found by the Council of the City of Los Angeles to be “extremely disturbing and disruptive to residents and businesses.” (L.A. Ord. No. 171664 (preamble).) Although the ordinance is e…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.