Kuroda v. SPJS Holdings, L.L.C.

Decided 2009-04-15

Cited by 345 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION CHANDLER, Chancellor. Plaintiffs primary claim in this case is that he is owed money pursuant to a limited liability company agreement. From around 2002 to 2006, plaintiff served as an investment adviser for a group of entities that invested in publicly traded Japanese corporations. As part of this arrangement, plaintiff entered into…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.