Kunkle v. Kunkle

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1990-05-09

Cited by 592 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Alice Robie Resnick, J., dissenting. I dissent from the majority’s *74 holding in paragraph one of the syllabus because it unnecessarily restricts a trial court’s discretion to award permanent alimony. In addition I dissent from the majority’s application of syllabus two to the facts of this case. However, I agree that in a charge against the payor spouse’s estate, the sum m…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.