Kucana v. Holder

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 2010-01-20

Cited by 842 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice Alito, concurring in the judgment. I agree that the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to review the denial of petitioner’s motion to reopen his removal proceeding, but I would decide this case on narrower grounds. The controlling statutory provision, 8 U. S. C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(ii), states that “no court shall have jurisdiction to review . . . any . . . decision ..…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.