Kubik v. Erhart

Decided 2010-11-16

Cited by 126 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*906 In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants Thomas E Erhart and Thomas E Erhart, EC., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of mi order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rebolini, J.), dated June 18, 2009, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the orde…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.