Kroger Texas Ltd. Partnership v. Suberu

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 2006-05-05

Cited by 437 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice JOHNSON, joined by Justice MEDINA and by Justice WAINWRIGHT as to Part III, concurring in part and dissenting in part. In connection with the first jury question, which submitted Theresa Suberu’s malicious prosecution claim, the jury was instoucted, without objection, that: “Malice” means ill will, bad or evil motive, or such gross indiffere…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.