Kroeger v. Department of Environmental Protection

Decided 2005-04-07

Cited by 102 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

DANA, J., with whom ALEXANDER, J., joins, dissenting. [¶ 23] Because Kroeger’s application for a permit to build a pier on his property met all of the Natural Resources Protection Act standards, I must respectfully dissent. [¶ 24] To qualify for a permit an applicant must meet all nine of the Act’s standards. 38 M.R.S.A. § 480-D (2001). Pursuant to 38 M.R.S.A. § 341-D(1-B) (2001), the Board o…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.