Kripp v. Kripp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2004-05-27

Cited by 240 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CONCURRING OPINION Justice NIGRO. I agree with the majority that the trial court properly admitted parol evidence in the instant case to clarify the meaning of the term “cohabitate” in the parties’ property settlement agreement. I write separately solely to state that as a former trial judge, I am troubled that Appellee did not appear before the trial court during either of the scheduled hearin…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.