Kremer v. Cox

Decided 1996-09-11

Cited by 212 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Quillin, Presiding Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I would affirm the judgment in toto. I agree with Judge Mahoney that Cox should not be permitted to agree to try the case under one theory, and then, after losing, asse…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.