KOCIAN, Charlotte T. v. GETTY REFINING & MARKETING COMPANY Appeal of Charlotte KOCIAN

U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · Decided 1983-06-15

Cited by 112 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

STERN, District Judge, dissenting. Had the current regulations governing filing in deferral states been in effect when plaintiff filed her charge with the EEOC in October of 1980, the majority concedes that plaintiff’s federal remedy would not be time barred. See C.F.R. § 1601.13(a)(3) (1982); Maj. op. at 752 n. 4. In trying to understand why the majority reaches out to block plaintiff’s case from bei…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.