Kim v. Fujikawa

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1989-03-29

Cited by 130 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

TROTT, Circuit Judge: These cases, consolidated for purposes of appeal, involve several issues arising from actions against a fiduciary of employee benefit plans who violated the prohibited transaction provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 , et seq., by transferring assets for the benefit of, and to, parties in interest. Since eac…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.