Kilbourn v. Sunderland

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1889-04-22

Cited by 197 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Me. Chief Justice Fullee delivered the opinion of the court. It is argued on behalf of Kilbourn, Latta and Olmstead that Stewart was an indispensable party to the cause, and that the bill should have been dismissed because he was not made suVh. Title to the real estate purchased by Sunderland, Hillyer ahd. Stewart was placed in Latta in trust as matter of conven…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.