Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.

Decided 1996-05-31

Cited by 201 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

RANSOM, Justice (specially concurring). I concur in the majority opinion except for the discussion under Part III as to the effect of Section 57-16-9. This discussion admittedly is not dispositive and purportedly only “supports a conclusion that [a prospective transferee] lacks standing.” I do not agree that the qualification of “without due cause” necessarily is to be li…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.