Cordy, J. In this case we hold that a public employer has a right to interlocutory review of the denial of its motion to dismiss based on a claim of immunity, even if the granting of *313 the motion would not dispose of the entire case against it. We also conclude that the Commonwealth’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ negligence claims should have been granted because,…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.