Kendrick v. Pippin

Decided 2011-05-09

Cited by 115 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice MARTINEZ, concurring in the judgment. I disagree with the majority's analysis and conclusion concerning res ipsa loquitur. In my view, an instruction on res ipsa loquitur should have been given in this case. The majority's opinion summarily concludes that the first element of res ipsa loquitur was not satisfied. I think the facts of this case support the opposite conclusion.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.