Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1996-07-03

Cited by 449 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Cook, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the legal determination of the majority that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Civ.R. 60(B) relief. In order to find that the trial court abused its discretion, Mr. Schulman’s neglect must be of such character that the only reasonable view is that it is excusable. The neglect here is Mr. Schulman’s failure to timely answer the plaintiffs complain…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.