Karla SCHIKORE, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. BANKAMERICA SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2001-10-16

Cited by 114 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I disagree with the majority that the Plan Administrator abused its discretion in denying Schikore’s claim. First, the majority implies that a heightened standard of review may be appropriate because of a potential conflict of interest between the employer responsible for funding Schikore’s benefits and the Plan Administrator responsible for determining Sch…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.