Kadderly v. Portland

Decided 1903-12-21

Cited by 155 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Bean, after stating the facts in the foregoing terms, delivered the opinion of the court. The position of defendants is that the charter under which the city was acting at the time this suit was instituted was in force and effect, because (1) the initiative and referendum amendment of 1902 is not a part of the constitution ; and (2) if it is, laws necessary for the immediate preservation of the publ…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.