Joseph J. Tomasso v. The Boeing Company

U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · Decided 2006-04-19

Cited by 207 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ROTH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Although the majority correctly recognizes that a decision to terminate an employee as part of a RIF differs from a decision to fire an employee for other reasons, it fails to apply this distinction in any meaningful way to the pretextual analysis outlined in Fuentes. 32 F.3d at 759. In short, the RIF conte…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.