Holmes, J., dissenting. The majority opinion is completely unfounded, unwarranted, and without any basis in the law of Ohio. Although, in my view, Blankenship 6 was an aberration, and served only to thoroughly confuse and confound Ohio’s legal community, this majority opinion goes even further in effecting a compound fracture of workers’ compensation law. The majority opinion is an extremely result-orie…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.