Jones v. City of Seattle

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2013-12-12

Cited by 126 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

J.M. Johnson, J. ¶113 (concurring) — I agree with the analysis of Justice González’s concurrence. I write separately, however, to express concern that due to the city of Seattle’s (City) failure to investigate and follow procedural rules, the jury may have been denied the benefit of relevant evidence and testimony by the challenged orders of the court here. The burden of these errors will fall on the City’s taxpayers, who must…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.