Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2005-10-05

Cited by 194 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Bryant, J., dissenting. {¶ 29} Being unable to agree with the majority opinion, I respectfully dissent. The majority holds in the syllabus that “[cjonsistent with long-standing Ohio jurisprudence in following federal law regarding antitrust cases, an indirect purchaser of goods may not file a Valentine Act claim for violations of Ohio antitrust law. (Illinois Brick v. Illinois (1977), <span class="cita…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.