Johnson v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Michigan · Decided 1963-10-10

Cited by 100 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

O’Hara, J. On review here is the order of the trial court denying motions for new trials and for judgments non obstantibus'veredictis. The judgments are upon a consolidation of 2 suits for trial. One is by Nathaniel Johnson for loss of consortium and for expense incurred by him for medical services rendered to his wife. The other is by the w…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.