Joel Levine v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States of America, Real Party in Interest

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1985-08-19

Cited by 119 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BEEZER, Circuit Judge: Richard W. Miller and his attorneys, Stanley I. Greenberg and Joel Levine, seek a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to dissolve a restraining order that prohibits the attorneys involved in Miller’s trial from communicating with the media regarding the merits of the case. To determine the validity of the order, we must address the clash betwee…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.