James v. James

Decided 1995-03-15

Cited by 175 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Fain, Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Robert L. James appeals from a judgment of the trial court adopting a referee’s report and recommendation and also from the denial of his motion for a new trial. Mr. James contends that the referee to whom his case was referred was required by Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct to disqualify him…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.