James H. Hinkle, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael Randle, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee

U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · Decided 2001-10-11

Cited by 246 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

From the opinion

OPINION BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , Petitioner filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing arguments to the jury and that his counsel’s performance was constitutionally ineffective because he failed to object duri…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗

Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.