Jacobs v. Halloran

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1998-04-02

Cited by 168 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION ZAPPALA, Justice. This appeal raises significant issues regarding the standard applicable to the dismissal of a case for inactivity pursuant to a defendant’s motion for non pros. 1 For the reasons set forth herein, we hold that the equitable principles underlying the entry of…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.