Jacobs v. Frank

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1991-06-05

Cited by 175 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Moyer, C.J. Our disposition of this case begins with a determination *113 as to whether Frank has a qualified privilege pursuant to R.C. 2305.25 that protects the statements he wrote in his October 25 letter.* 1 If the statements in Frank’s letter are cloaked with a qualified privilege, Jacobs must prove Frank acted with “actual malice” to defe…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.