Per Curiam. The only issue' appealed to this court is whether the trial court acted improperly in sustaining defendant’s motion for summary judgment, by finding, as a *359 matter of law, no duty on the part of defendant to “warn plaintiff of the nature of the roller coaster ride. The owner or occupier of premises is not an insurer of the safety of…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.